Small Steps, Big Results: Greening the Magnet Lab
By Amy Mast
The Magnet Lab is known for doing things big. Big-name
scientists use big grants to do big research on some of the
world's biggest magnets.
Some things, however, are better small – like trash piles, electric
bills and water usage. From small steps such as recycling to
hugely ambitious ones such as rethinking the design of research
magnets, the lab is working to get the same big scientific
results with a smaller environmental footprint. Many of the lab's
conservation measures share the added advantage of
saving money – another important goal in a research
environment where every dollar matters.
Engineering technician Alfie Brown holds one of the lab's new induction lights.
Small steps, electrifying results
The world's most powerful
magnets naturally require a
lot of, well, power. The lab's
superstar 45-tesla hybrid
magnet, when running at
full field, uses about $27,000
worth of power during a nine-hour
workday. The overall
power bill at the Tallahassee
facility generally runs around
$570,000 per month – about
7 percent of Tallahassee's total power capacity. Over the past
three years the annual bill has been reduced by about $400,000
a year through a combination of simple measures that, when
applied to a facility this size, can really add up.
During this time, the lab:
- Replaced an aging and inefficient vacuum pump with a
lower-horsepower, more efficient pump. The old pump cost
about $20,000 per year to operate; the new one, a mere $700.
- Replaced old air compressors with higher efficiency models,
saving about $20,000 in electricity per year.
- Pulled out extra light bulbs in rooms that were already
adequately lit.
- Installed motion sensors on the lighting systems in all offices
so that they'll go dark when unoccupied.
- Lowered the heating set points by
two degrees.
- Replaced the lighting in the lab's Ion
Cyclotron Resonance lab with newer,
brighter induction lighting that lasts
four times as long as conventional
lighting.
A lot of the measures we're putting into
place are things we tried before. Maybe
it was a little costly at the time, or we got
too many complaints and we dropped it,"
said Facilities Management Director John
Kynoch. "But during the past couple of
years, gas prices went so high that a lot
of people started thinking about energy
efficiency in more everyday terms, and
revisiting some of those things we'd
initially suggested made more sense.
People are willing to put up with a small
inconvenience here or there if there's a
measurable result."
Recycling bins are stationed in all office areas.
Kynoch said that once funding is in place, his group also plans
to install water-efficient toilets and lower-wattage (but just as
bright) lighting in office space.
Streamlining support infrastructure
The magnets that eat up the bulk of the lab's energy usage
have a "big three" of support resources: electricity, water and
supercooled liquid helium. Electricity provides power, while
water and liquid helium temper the heat created by all that
energy. These big three come with some big bills; in addition to
that $400,000 monthly electric bill, add in $1.3 million per year in
liquid helium.
There's no way around it – the Magnet Lab uses a lot of water,
about 250,000 gallons on a typical summer day. About 200,000
gallons of that water evaporates in the lab's cooling tower while the
other 50,000 gallons run out of sprinklers and back into the ground.
Kynoch says his team is exploring ways to improve that ratio.
As for helium, while there's a helium recycling system in place,
capturing and reusing a colorless, odorless gas can be a pretty
tricky proposition, one that Kynoch describes as "challenging
and expensive." Helium used to keep the magnets cool heats up
and boils. The boiled-off gas is captured and piped through a
system where it's purified and re-cooled.
Sounds great, but there are three big problems. First, the system
that's in place can't keep up with the amount of helium being
used in the lab's magnets. Second, the system is full of holes –
literally. The pipes that carry helium through the building are
made with PVC and for every leak technicians find and repair,
Kynoch says, several more spring up. Third, helium is a natural
resource, and while it is one of the earth's most plentiful elements,
it must be extracted from natural gas fields and then purified. This
supply won't last forever, so conserving and reusing the helium
the lab buys is the environmentally responsible thing to do.
Kynoch says the lab will eventually purchase a new stainless
steel recovery and purification system. With it in place the lab could go from recovering 30 percent
of its used helium all the way up to 80
percent. Do the math, and that $2.5
million needed to update the system
starts to make a lot of sense. The system
could pay for itself in about two and
a half years. Helium storage is already
improving, with four new tanks capable
of storing the equivalent of 9,812 liters of
liquid helium behind the lab, enough to
power the lab's biggest superconducting
magnet for two months.
The lab's biggest energy monster,
however, is the plain old electricity used
to ramp the magnets up to their superstrong
fields. Last year, DC Program
Director Eric Palm was part of a team
charged with rethinking how the lab
uses energy. Instead of giving magnet
users a limited amount of time to spend
in the experimental "cells" that house
the magnets, the new system allows
more flexible time, but puts users on an
energy budget. Now, scientists have all
the time they need to solve problems or
make repairs during an experiment –
but they have to watch the bottom line
when it comes to energy.
"Many users didn't like the change at
first. In the past, we asked people to be
energy-conscious, but they weren't truly
aware of their contribution to the power
bill, and without things being quantified
it's hard to really see your own impact,"
said Palm. "And the numbers were
astronomical. Somebody sitting at full
field in the hybrid will cost about $3,000
per hour for the energy bill alone."
Palm said because of the energy budget,
people are more aware of how much
energy they are using.
"Like anybody with a budget, you're
really squeezing at the end of the
month, trying to make everything fit," he
said. "People are really thinking ahead of
time and mapping out what they want
to do, and it really has made us partners
in saving energy."
The amount of energy used in a
magnet is proportional to the magnetic
field squared, meaning that conducting
an experiment at 20 tesla uses only
a fourth as much energy as the same
magnet at 40 tesla. With that in mind,
researchers are also being encouraged
to collect data with the minimum
magnetic field needed to get the
results they're after. "Around here,
money-saving and being green can be
the same thing, which is great. This kind
of approach saves us a lot of money
and energy, which we can use for other
things," said Palm.
Building greener magnets
Another way to conduct leaner, greener
research is to rethink the way magnets
themselves are built. The Series Connected
Hybrid, currently under development by
the Magnet Lab, is one of two ambitious
attempts in that direction.
A key advantage of the new magnet,
which is a hybrid of a resistive and
a superconducting magnet, is that
it will use one-third less power than
traditional all-resistive magnets. That
means experiments can be performed
at lower cost and for longer time frames
than would be the case using existing
all-resistive magnets. Resistive magnets
require both electricity and cooled water
while being used; superconducting
magnets require little or no electrical
power to run once they are brought up
to full field so long as they are cooled
to ultra low temperatures. Eventually,
multiple numbers of such hybrid
systems will increase the number of
experiments that can be carried out at
the lab each year.

Recycling at the Magnet Lab,
2006-2009, in pounds
Even more ambitious are plans to build
a 32-tesla all-superconducting magnet.
New materials have been evaluated and
tested that far exceed the performance
of niobium, the material that has been
used to build most superconducting
magnets up to this point. Niobium-based
superconducting magnets are
limited to a field of about 23.5 tesla.
"The average cost for a resistive magnet
is $774 an hour, and the lab's 20-tesla
superconducting magnets are $18 an
hour," said Tim Murphy, director of the
lab's Millikelvin facility. "Measurements
that require sitting at high fields for
long periods of time would greatly
benefit from a 32-tesla superconducting
magnet, since they could sit at high
fields for days without incurring huge
electrical costs."
Recycling on a grand scale
There are almost as many different ways
of recycling materials at the Magnet
Lab as there are materials. The
lab's recycling program, in place
for the past three years, now gives
new life to about 65 percent of all
trash leaving the lab.
It takes a lot of packaging to
safely deliver scientific and other
equipment to the lab: The lab recycles 120 pounds
of cardboard each week. Packing peanuts
from deliveries are picked up by
UPS, which reuses them in new
packages. Stations for regular office
paper, plastic, glass and aluminum
are stationed throughout the
building, but the lab also recycles
difficult-to-dispose-of items
such as scientific equipment and
computers. Even wood from
shipping pallets is picked up by
Florida State University and ground
into the mulch that surrounds
campus buildings.
When contracting upgrade
and replacement projects on the lab's
infrastructure, Facilities Engineer Sean
Coyne says that the lab generally
specifies that all recyclable waste
materials from those projects is disposed
of properly. A recent update of the
fire alarm system yielded four tons of
recyclable conduit.
"We recycle the waste metal from the
welding shop and the machine shop as
well. Usually it's lots of small stuff, but
we've recycled as much as 8 tons at
a time," said Coyne.
Taking a long view
There's no way around the fact that the
lab uses a lot of energy, but in such a
big place, small changes like the ones
described here really add up over time.
Big steps – such as the 32-tesla all-superconducting
magnet – may take
longer, but when they're successful,
they'll mark a permanent departure from
the old standards of energy use. And
who knows? Maybe some of the material that
magnet technicians use during assembly
of the new magnets will be making its
second trip to the Magnet Lab.
More from this issue